Sachgebiete

Beschreibung:

VII; 194 S. Broschiert.

Bemerkung:

Gutes Exemplar. - Dissertation / 1973. - Mit einigen (wenigen) Anstreichungen. - PRESYSTEMATIC CONTRASTS BETWEEN LITERAL AND METAPHORICAL USES OF WORDS - Summary of Chapter - Are Frozen Metaphors Literal or Metaphorical?- Metaphorical Use Depends Upon Literal Use - Primary Sense Is Every Literal Sense Primary? - Words With No Primary Sense - Frozen Metaphor Is Not Metaphorical Just - Because Its Sense Once Was Dependent - Chronologically Earliest Sense Not a Word's - Only Literal Sense - A Word With a Primary Sense May Have Literal - Senses That Are Not Primary - No Reason to Regard Frozen Metaphors as - Metaphorical Has Been Found - What Has Been Achieved and What Has Not - SEMANTIC ANALYSIS AND METAPHORICAL EXPRESSIONS - Summary of Chapter - Strategy - Disclaimer - Raw Data - Data to Be Used and Data to Be Discarded - Semantic Values^- Grammatical Classification - Lexical Readings for W - Remarks of Ziff's Approach - Sentences in D(W) Without Interpretation Established Usage Metaphors Have No Established - Usage - Frozen Metaphors Have Established Usage and So - Are Literal - Literalness Is Not a Matter of Degree - Conditions Under Which W Is Used Metaphorically In s WHEN AN EXPRESSION IS NOT LITERAL - An Expression Counts As Literal Unless There Are Reasons to Reject Every Literal - Interpretation of It - Restriction to Declarative Instances - No Intelligible LiteralInterpretation Possible Literal Interpretation Rejected Because - Outrageously False - Literal Interpretation Rejected Because - Self-Contradictory - Literal Interpretation Rejected Because It - Is a Pointless Truism - Literal Interpretation Rejected Because - Contextually Unacceptable - Literal Interpretation Rejected Upon - Instruction - LITERAL REPLACEMENTS FOR METAPHORS- Objectives of the Chapter - In Every Metaphor, Some Words Are Used Literally and Some Are Used Non-Literally- Literal Version Literal Component Figuration Expression Replacing Expression - Associating Relations - Complicating Factors- Two Kinds of Metaphors: Monadic and Dyadic How One May Determine What a Dyadic Metaphor - Is Being Used to Mean - How One May Determine What a Monadic Metaphor - Is Being Used to Mean - There is No Way In Which It Could be Known That a List of Replacing Expressions is Incomplete - Influence of Context - Metaphors, In General, Have a Plurality of Interpretations Literal Paraphrase Is Not In - General Possible - Criteria for Selecting an Interpretation- Limitations of Literal Explication- Why a Metaphor Would be Used to Convey Something That Could Be Said, Just as Well, Literally - RECENT CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE EXPLICATION OF METAPHORS - Contents of Chapter - Richards' Treatment of Metaphor - Black's Treatment of Metaphor - Beardsley's Treatment of Metaphor - On Balance.